Talent Management: How to Choose Ability & Personality Assessment Tools

This informal CPD article ‘Talent Management: How to Choose Ability & Personality Assessment Tools’ was provided by Quest Partnership, who offer Occupational Test User training programs that contribute to the development of individuals' skills within the realm of global HR management and Talent acquisition.

In the ever-evolving world of HR and Talent Management, making informed hiring and development decisions is crucial to building a high-performing workforce. Ability and Personality assessments that provide valuable insights into candidates’ strengths, work styles, and potential, can support HR teams to make data-driven decisions that enhance hiring accuracy, employee engagement, and long-term retention. By leveraging these assessments, organisations can align talent strategies with business objectives, ensuring they attract, develop, and retain the right people.

The Role of Ability and Personality Testing in Occupational Assessment

Introduction

Occupational assessments play a crucial role in modern recruitment, employee development, and workforce planning. Two key components of these assessments are ability testing and personality testing. While ability tests evaluate cognitive and technical competencies, personality tests provide insight into an individual’s behavioural tendencies and suitability for a given role. When used effectively, these assessments can help to enhance hiring decisions, foster employee growth, and contribute to organisational success.

Understanding Ability Testing

Ability tests, also known as aptitude tests, measure a candidate’s capacity to perform specific tasks or solve problems. These tests can be categorised into several types:

  1. Cognitive Ability Tests – Assess numerical, verbal, and logical reasoning skills, often used in hiring to predict job performance.
  2. Technical Ability Tests – Measure job-specific skills, such as coding proficiency for software developers or mechanical reasoning for engineers.
  3. Spatial and Abstract Reasoning Tests – Evaluate an individual's ability to recognise patterns, manipulate shapes, and solve visual problems, often used in design and engineering fields.
  4. Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) – Assess decision-making and problem-solving abilities in work-related scenarios, they are a unique test of Managerial Judgement - an individual’s ability to decide on effective ways of handling real life situations.

Research suggests that cognitive ability is one of the strongest predictors of job performance across a wide range of industries (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998). Employers use ability tests to identify candidates who are best suited to the intellectual demands of a role, reducing turnover and training costs.

The Role of Personality Testing

While ability tests measure what a person can do, personality tests explore how they are likely to behave in a workplace setting. These assessments help employers understand whether an individual’s traits align with the requirements of a role and the company culture.

Commonly used personality frameworks include:

  1. The Big Five Personality Traits (OCEAN Model) – Examines Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism, offering insights into work-related behaviours.
  2. MOSAIC Personality Tasks – A task-based personality assessment designed to highlight blind-spots unknown to candidates and reduce bias by measuring the big-5 personality traits through interactive tasks.
  3. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – Team building and development tool. Categorises individuals into four dichotomous scales: introvert/extrovert (IE), thinking/feeling (TF), sensing/intuiting (SN), and judging/perception (JP) based on their preferences in perceiving and making decisions.
  4. Hogan Personality Inventory – Measures traits relevant to job performance and leadership potential. It focuses on three key areas: everyday behaviour, stress responses & core values, guiding personal & professional growth.

Research indicates that personality traits such as conscientiousness and emotional stability strongly correlate with job performance, particularly in roles requiring high levels of responsibility and interpersonal skills (Barrick & Mount, 1991).

cpd-Quest-Partnership-occupational-assessments-evaluate-Emotional-Intelligence
Occupational assessments evaluate Emotional Intelligence (EI)

Measuring Emotional Intelligence Through Personality Assessments

In addition to traditional personality traits, many modern occupational assessments also evaluate Emotional Intelligence (EI), which refers to an individual's ability to recognise, understand, and manage their own emotions, as well as the emotions of others. High EI is associated with better leadership, teamwork, and conflict resolution skills, making it an essential factor when screening candidates for roles requiring strong interpersonal interactions.

Emotional Intelligence assessments typically measure key components such as:

  • Self-awareness – Understanding one’s own emotions and their impact on behaviour.
  • Self-regulation – Managing emotions effectively, particularly under pressure.
  • Motivation – Demonstrating resilience and a proactive approach to challenges.
  • Empathy – Understanding and responding appropriately to others' emotions.
  • Social Skills – Building positive relationships and effective communication.

Studies suggest that Emotional Intelligence is a significant predictor of workplace performance, particularly in leadership and customer-facing roles (Goleman, 1998). Organisations that incorporate EI assessments alongside personality and ability testing can make more informed hiring decisions, improving team cohesion and overall workplace productivity.

Benefits of Combining Ability and Personality Testing

When used together, ability and personality assessments provide a holistic view of a candidate’s potential. Key benefits include:

  • Enhanced Predictive Validity – Combining both assessments improves the accuracy of hiring decisions by evaluating both competency and cultural fit.
  • Reduced Bias in Hiring – Standardised testing minimises subjective judgments, promoting fairness and diversity.
  • Improved Employee Development – Understanding an employee’s cognitive strengths and personality traits enables tailored training and career progression.
  • Better Team Dynamics – Organisations can build well-balanced teams by aligning personality traits with team roles and responsibilities.
  •  

Best Practices for Implementing Occupational Assessments

To maximise the effectiveness of ability and personality testing, organisations should follow these best practices:

  1. Use Valid and Reliable Tests – Ensure that assessments are scientifically validated and relevant to the job role. The British Psychological Society’s (BPS) Psychological Testing Centre (PTC) provides information relating to standards in tests and testing for test takers, test users, test developers and members of the public.
  2. Avoid Over-Reliance on Testing – Combine assessments with structured interviews and other evaluation methods for a comprehensive hiring process.
  3. Ensure Ethical and Fair Use – Maintain transparency with candidates about the purpose of testing and how results will be used. The BPS provides comprehensive advice for test users including candidate feedback best practices.
  4. Regularly Review and Update Tests – Adapt testing strategies to reflect changes in job roles and industry requirements.
  5. Comply with Data Protection and Privacy Regulations – Ensure that all occupational assessments adhere to relevant legal and ethical standards, such as the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). Employers must obtain informed consent, securely store test results, and only use data for legitimate business purposes.

Conclusion

Ability and personality testing are valuable tools in occupational assessment, helping organisations make informed hiring and development decisions. Empowering HR professionals with Test User training to effectively use psychometric assessments is an investment in both people and performance—enabling organisations to make smarter talent decisions, foster growth, and drive long-term success.

We hope this article was helpful. For more information from Quest Partnership, please visit their CPD Member Directory page. Alternatively, you can go to the CPD Industry Hubs for more articles, courses and events relevant to your Continuing Professional Development requirements.

References

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
  • Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.